Talk:Reed Smith

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move page. The possible ambiguity with Paul Reed Smith is now resolved with a hatnote, so there doesn't seem to be any other reason to diverge from the WP:NCCORP guidelines. GTBacchus(talk) 22:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Reed Smith → —
 * This is the full name of the law firm. Sometimes the name of the firm is mistaken for Paul Reed Smith Guitars RebeccaBlaw (talk) 19:20, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:NCCORP means that this in not uncontroversial. Dpmuk (talk) 19:58, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose, based on the linked guideline. A hatnote such as can be used to resolve confusion between the two topics. Propaniac (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Puffery / COI
There have been repetitive edits to puff up the article. The article does not in it's current state adhere to Wikipedia's particularly neutral stance. Histnewbie (talk) 06:59, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Some proposed changes
Information to be added or removed: To the end of the History section please add – Also in 2018, Entertainment and Media Industry Group partner James Sully was named one of the top 25 lawyers of the year, according to Music Business UK and Centtrip Music’s Legal & Accountancy 50 almanac.

Explanation of issue: The section does not have the most up to date information on the firm and it’s employees.

References supporting change:

Danainlondon (talk) 10:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Reply 5-FEB-2019
Regards,  Spintendo   12:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Per WP:BALASP.