Talk:Reflections on Having Left a Place of Retirement/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

A few comments: Should the heading "Poems" be "Poem"? Also, is the lead adequate? It seems to address the major points of the article but it looks like it could be a little longer.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

That aside, this article meets the GA criteria. —Noisalt (talk) 22:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)