Talk:Reggie Ball/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently does not meet the criteria and is now on hold until improvements are made.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The prose is OK, a 6/10.
 * Lead is much too short, expand so that it gives a clear summary of the whole article.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I see tags, sort them out.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * I'd like to see more on his personal life, and his professional career is poorly covered and should be expanded in clear, sourced paragraphs.


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:


 * No sign of significant improvement. This article now fails GAR and will be delisted.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:45, 3 February 2009 (UTC)