Talk:Reginald Miles/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Ian Rose (talk · contribs) 07:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Will aim to get to this over the coming week. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Toolbox checks -- no dab or EL issues.

Prose/structure/content
 * Copyedited a bit as usual so pls let know if any concerns.
 * I think little flags and icons in the infobox are deprecated under WP:MOSFLAG so I don't use them in bios but I won't force the issue if you prefer them.

Referencing -- I think self-published sources are generally frowned upon but the Haigh & Polaschek book supports fairly uncontroversial info and this isn't A/FA so I'd say it's fair enough; no concerns with the others and the formatting looks okay.

Images -- licensing looks okay although I'd have thought it should be consistent for both pictures (the second includes a PD-1996 tag but the first doesn't; might be safer to add that to the first)

Nice work on an ultimately tragic figure whom I hadn't heard of before this article. Pretty well ready to pass but will await your feedback re. the copyediting and image tag before I finalise. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Ian, thanks for the review. Your copyedits look good, I saw you corrected a couple of howler typos! I have deleted flags/icons from the infobox (I prefer their usage but suspect I would be in the minority). A tag has also been added to the infobox image. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 07:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Tks, passing now. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)