Talk:Regular moon/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Nominator: 00:51, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Pencilsforall (talk · contribs) 00:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I've read your article and I am working on comments. I'll add a table with comments and notes when I finish the review.

I think this is a really interesting article and you've done a great job! I learned so much by reading this article! My main concern so far is whether the article is written for a broad audience. It's clearly written for knowledgeable readers, but it's unclear to me that it follows the WP:ONEDOWN suggestion. You might want to consider reviewing suggestions for making technical articles understandable WP:TECHNICAL. I reviewed the Hemmingway App and calculated the Flesch Kincaid grade level which both suggest that the reading level may be too difficult for a broad audience. I'll have specific suggestions and comments after I finish with spot checking references and so on. Pencilsforall (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


 * 2b: addressed; it turns out source 30 also made mention of this. Elaborated as ... though it remains uncertain whether volcanic outgassing or sublimation is the dominant supporter of Io's atmosphere. -Ark

Sounds good! Pencilsforall (talk) 00:22, 4 May 2024 (UTC)