Talk:Reicholzheim

Copied
I think it is pretty certain that the content was copied and pasted based upon the first edit. If it was, the question is whether it came from a public domain source. Since most sources are not public domain and it is unlikely to be from the U.S. Federal Government, where most of our public domain material comes from, it is very likely that the article is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, I have not been able to find the source on Google. -- Kjkolb 20:42, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Hello Kolb, Originally some of what you said may had been true in a certain sence. I had cut and pasted somethings for re-work. And when I saved the work it wasn't ready for publication. I had to edit. I didn't think it would be published untill it was wikified. Now I know better.

The information has been compiled from books and other sources. My family comes from Reicholzheim, I also belong to a Historical work group for Reicholzheim and the area of the Bronnbach monks, and have the same research to most of the same records the authors of the books had. I also have "all" the records from Reicholzheim Church books. dating back to the year 1500

Unfortunatly sometimes the translation gets sticky for me, thats one of the problems. It is similar to that of the German wiki Website on Reicholzheim as used that for a format as well as some of the structure. Its alike but not identical. Any help is appreciated.

Thank You

Corrections
Hi there, Reicholzheim is located almost at the border of Baden-Württemberg, not as southern as the map shows (compare the German article). The landscape of Tauberfranken is split since that time into a Bavarian and a Badensian part is not correct - Tauberfranken is split in a Frankonian and a Badensian part. Bavaria ist the state, Frankonia is the region - the latter is historical and thus correct.--213.221.124.10 (talk) 10:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)