Talk:Reigomys/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Airplaneman   ✈  18:41, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Prose flows quite well, terms linked/described adequately (thanks, WP:POPUPS). Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Good here. Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Yes. Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Well, no images are used, but I understand they are either nonexistent, copyrighted or extremely hard to find. Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Yes, definitely GA status. For FA, I would recommend getting hold of some pictures (if possible). Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Yes, definitely GA status. For FA, I would recommend getting hold of some pictures (if possible). Airplaneman   ✈  18:56, 18 April 2010 (UTC)