Talk:Reinhard Seiler

Forsyth, Schaulen
@ K.e.Coffman: I see you have attacked another air biography with your editorial scalpel. Your reason cited was to remove "non-RS or likely non-RS" sources. Can you give us your reason you consider the Osprey book by Robert Forsyth and non-RS, yet have chosen to keep the other Osprey books by John Weal included? Do you feel that the company's editorial standards have slipped significantly in the years between Weal's last book and the newer book by Forsythe. I am also interested what is defined as "likely non-RS"? Is this a new Wiki-reference category - does it just not "feel right"? Or is it just your subjective opinion having read the book yourself and compared it to other books you have read on the subject? Philby NZ (talk) 23:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I believe the editor is referring to this edit. Neither book was used for citations, so I removed them per WP:FURTHER. The edit summary "non RS or likely non RS & not used for citations" is a canned edit summary I have saved in my browser. Hope this clarifies. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:06, 31 October 2016 (UTC)