Talk:Relationship anarchy

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:17, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * RadicalRelationsHeart.svg

WikiProject Medicine?
I'm not seeing this subject has having anything to do with medicine. I've added some other projects that seem more appropriate but not removed WikiProject Medicine for now as it has been given a rating which possibly suggests that at least one person associated with WikiProject Medicine thinks that it is legit. What do we think? Remove it or not? Can anybody do that or do we need WikiProject Medicine to decide? --DanielRigal (talk) 22:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ (Be bold! If someone disagrees, you can always discuss: BOLD, revert, discuss cycle.) czar  00:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Methods for discussing relationship anarchy section
While the rest of the article seems OK, and I've !voted to keep it on the AfD, I think the "Methods for discussing relationship anarchy" section is absolutely no good at all and that this is probably the main reason why the whole article looks bad to some people. Most of it is unreferenced and it reads more like a "how to" than encyclopaedic content. My first thought was that it looked like was pasted from elsewhere but I didn't find any evidence of that when I did a quick check. Nonetheless, I think it is unfixably unencyclopaedic and we should just remove it. Any thoughts or objections? --DanielRigal (talk) 22:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ czar  00:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)