Talk:Relative species abundance

Style manual
Manual of Style (mathematics) exists.

Are there really some people who are not offended by something like the following?
 * $$\alpha\,\!x$$, $${\alpha\,\!x^2\over{2}}$$, $${\alpha\,\!x^3\over{3}}$$,…,$${\alpha\,\!x^n\over{n}}$$
 * $$\alpha\,\!x$$, $${\alpha\,\!x^2\over{2}}$$, $${\alpha\,\!x^3\over{3}}$$,…,$${\alpha\,\!x^n\over{n}}$$

I changed this to the following, which is standard usage both within Wikipedia and elsewhere, both before Wikipedia existed and in the present day:
 * $$\alpha, {\alpha\,\!x^2\over 2}, {\alpha\,\!x^3\over 3}, \dots, {\alpha\,\!x^n\over n} $$
 * $$\alpha, {\alpha\,\!x^2\over 2}, {\alpha\,\!x^3\over 3}, \dots, {\alpha\,\!x^n\over n} $$

Also, obviously when you write
 * x + 2 = y
 * where
 * x is the number of eggs
 * [etc.]

the word "where" is NOT the beginning of a new sentence; it's part of the same sentence that was already underway. I've seen this weird usage only in Wikipedia, in which a period follows the equation, then a capital initial W is used in "where". Are there people who think it should be done that way, or is that some weird sort of absent-mindedness somehow induced by Wikipedia?

WP:MOSMATH and WP:MOS were repeatedly ignored in formatting and style in these sorts of matters in this article as I found it. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

"Gather relative abundance data" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gather_relative_abundance_data&redirect=no Gather relative abundance data] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. &#32; Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:46, 17 June 2023 (UTC)