Talk:Relentless Software

WP:VG Assessment
Missing content Improvements to be made
 * Background of its founders (What skill sets did David Amor and Andrew Eades have and bring to their creation? This can be helpful in context.)
 * Headcount, organization (especially the first)
 * Location, office setup
 * Culture (its motto is, somewhat, in the History section)
 * Private or publicly listed company?
 * Any notable contributions besides video games (prominent charity events, or community projects)?
 * Copyediting required: "Amor and Eades persuaded SCEE [...] Much to their shock, SCEE agreed [...]" &mdash; "persuaded" would have meant they successfully done so, hence the later clause would be redundant; furthermore, "much to their shock" is informal and unencyclopaedic. Various "noun plus -ing" issues (refer to User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises.  Several one- or two-sentence paragraphs.  MOS violations (no "&" please).

Missing content is the primary reason for my grading of this as "C"-class. The company's relatively small scale notability and its single product line leaves its importance to the WP:VG project as low. Jappalang (talk) 00:48, 5 November 2008 (UTC)