Talk:Religion in Luxembourg

Great article!!!
I personally am an antimetaphysicalist atheist. Not generically irreligious or religiously indifferent. If you don't merge theists, then don't merge nontheists. In politics and in philosophy, mergers don't serve the statistical depiction, but dark means of manipulation! Say what it is! Mergers are a distorted manipulation! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:8415:3D00:906B:134A:AF49:556C (talk) 12:40, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

All metaphysical opinions and all human beings are equally important!
Metaphysics doesn't mean only supersensualism but also the metalogic of physics. All human beings are equally important so we shouldn't call it "religious statistics" but "metaphysical statistics" or "dogmatic statistics". It's unfair to name a statistical survey with the hypernym of one group of values.

order of different values

 * 1) write first the bigger numbers
 * 2) put first analytical beliefs (if the numbers are the same) (other is more important than unknown, because the other-believer declared something specific and we can find it from analytical statistics, instead the unknown isn't specific - but put unknown first than other if it has a bigger value because all people are important thus we must respect hierarchically the largest possible numbers)
 * 3) if two values are the same, put traditional religions first (if one number is bigger put the bigger number first; only if two numbers are the same put the traditional religion of that specific region first [Christian Orthodoxy is closer to Protestantism than Islam; Shia and Sunni are closer than Christianity)