Talk:Religious communism

Removal of Christian Communism Section
It appears that Mihnea Tudoreanu has correctly decided to move the Christian communism section of this article into the Christian communism article, which I believe was the right thing to do. Mihnea has also respectuflly placed the link to the Christian communism article with a brief statement regarding the controversy surrounding the idea of Christian communism.

But Mihnea has improperly and conveniently failed to add the entire Christian communism section to the Christian communism article. Mihnea has also filled the Christian communism article with POV material instead of using the cited material that was originally removed from this article that was expected to be placed in the Christian communism article. This deleted material will now be added into the Christian communism article as was expected when it was originally removed from this article. (Gaytan 19:24, 18 October 2005 (UTC))

Added a Website to the article.

PJB 18:43, 23 February 2006 (UTC) ( Talkin' to me?)

kibbutzim
The kibbutzim in Israel are the product of a secular, not religious, political and social movement.
 * I was about to say - I thought the labor zionist movement was the least religious of them all. Joffeloff 20:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

This article is pure garbage and BS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.113.161 (talk) 16:58, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Islam and communism
Bernard Lewis was a critic of Islam, are there any other scholars mentioned in his article? Faro0485 (talk) 01:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Concerning deletion
Every now and then I get a message on Wikipedia notifying me of a proposed merger of articles, deletion or other notable change. This is because I was around in the very early days of Wikipedia and started, or contributed to, various pages which may have subsequently become obsolete as the nature of the wiki has expanded, changed and developed. These days I seldom edit anything on the wiki and, when I do, it's usually only a grammar or spelling correction or some small thing. Now, the article in question, "Religious Communism", is an example of the sort of thing which was originally written when Wikipedia was a much simpler place and there was room for lots of little stub articles which were created with the intention of just sort of "pencilling in" a sketchy beginning of a topic for other people to expand and alter as necessary. I notice that, since the first version this article was written, a portal for Communism has been created and this article was incorporated into it. I think that's a great pity because the article looks very much out of place here and should probably have been better incorporated into a religion portal instead. Or then again, perhaps it would've been better to merge the article with the main page about Communism in a paragraph devoted to the history of communal and utopian philosophies. If I remember correctly (and I'm 62, so fingers crossed that I do remember correctly) a merger of that nature was more or less what I was thinking of all those years ago when I started writing for this article. Yes, that's what would get my vote, I think: To merge the page into the larger history of communal and utopian philosophies, rather than leave Wikipedia without any mention whatsoever of this import bit of social history.

wayland (talk) 23:55, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * - may I suggest that you participate on the RfD page rather than posting here? You can click here to get there. Atsme 📞📧 05:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)