Talk:Religious policies of Constantius II

Inappropriate title
The title seems to me very incorrect, considering that as far as you can tell from the life of Constantius II, he was a pagan-christian syncretic and quite tolerant, so more than anti-pagan politics, I think it should be treated as a reform of paganism, since at that historical moment, at least the traditional Roman religion was not like in the time of Augustus. Even among the pagans themselves there were groups opposed to sacrifices and divination because they were considered anti-rational, reaching the extreme that there should be no temples, this arose within Neoplatonism, since it was believed that to contact the Logos there was no need for temples and such opulence, but the training of the soul and mind. 84.78.240.150 (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2019 (UTC)