Talk:Reload4j

Notable
The reload4j fork is just another fork. There is several others on GitHub which aim to do the same. Why is this one more notable? IMHO it is also lacking the point of view from the log4j 2 team. If notable, it should also be mentioned that the whole project is basically driven by a single developer, and not a "huge group" of volunteers, as the article suggests. Cy23 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Man thinking (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

The text is indeed copied from reload4j.qos.ch web site. However, the copied the text refers to common knowledge and it is rather short in length. If necessary, it can be reworded.