Talk:Relocation (personal)

I have named this article "Moving (address)" just for disambiguation purposes, but I don't know if this is the best title. If anyone can think of something that sounds better, that would be very helpful. I have also found it hard to identify some fitting categories for this article. I have created about a dozen articles before, and I am quite familiar with many of Wikipedia's existing categories. But this is the most difficult to categorize article I have ever created. I was motivated to create it because a friend of mine just moved, and I found no article on Wikipedia about the process of moving.

I would also like to see some expansion of this article. Some topics that can be described in here could be the average number of times a person moves in his/her life, or the impact of one's moving on oneself and others close to that person, should sources be found. Tatterfly (talk) 19:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Title change proposal

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the proposal was no consensus to support move. JPG-GR (talk) 05:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

It has been suggested that this article be retitled "Moving", and the current Moving be changed to Moving (disambiguation). This article represents the most common usage of the term, and all the other uses described on the disambiguation page are more like subarticles. Sebwite (talk) 22:07, 29 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Oppose Moving (address) is actually getting less views a month than this db page or Moving (Peter, Paul and Mary album) and Moving (film). To even stand a chance of claiming more importance than those articles, somebody needs to merge moving address, moving company and moving industry into one decent article, because right now, Moving (address) is a joke of an article that apparently nobody wants to read or edit, and is currently nothing more than a dicdef with an WP:OR list attatched. MickMacNee (talk) 23:49, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose, as a linkable encyclopedic term, the dictionary sense is not necessarily the primary topic. See WP:OVERLINK. older ≠ wiser 10:23, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.