Talk:Renault FT in Estonian service

Untitled
Is there really a point in having an article on the exported model, when it could just be added to the original article?
 * It's comleatly pointles. Tehnicaly they didn't differ from other FT-17s and Estonyans didn't modyfay them either (not significantly atleast). Their use in Estonia should be described in some Estonian military history article.--Kyng (talk) 10:32, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

They should just delete this article. (Anonymous)
 * Concur. No point to this article. MTWEmperor (talk) 18:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed. --Trifler (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Concur. Kges1901 (talk) 09:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

this doesnt have much sense
why there is a page about a renault ft of estonia? the only thing that they need is to add estonia to the users list and done, its the same than the original, and there is no reason to create a new page, even if it were a new variant, this is just non-sense — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.4.80.118 (talk) 00:11, 20 May 2014 (UTC) ✅