Talk:Renfrew Ferry

Proposed merger
An editor has proposed the merger of the Amfibus article into this one.


 * Oppose It is not certain yet that the Amfibus will enter service. Should it do so, it cannot be seen as a direct replacement of the ferry, as it will also serve places that the ferry never did. Mjroots (talk) 22:24, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose This Amfibus is a worldwide unique kind of transport and it is to be the first usage of such bus-boat as line transport vehicle. It is very more notable than one ferry. But we should consider whether the word "amfibus" is a name of some specific project or it should be (or will be) a common term for all amphibious buses. --ŠJů (talk) 03:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose but include mention/link in this article. Finavon (talk) 00:15, 10 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I've removed the merge to tag from the Amfibus article. It's been five months since the original proposal and there has been no support for it. Therefore I conclude that the two articles should remain separate. Mjroots (talk) 21:02, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Renfrew Ferry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208004230/http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk:80/docherty/cca/archive2008.html to http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/docherty/cca/archive2008.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 02:53, 15 January 2016 (UTC)