Talk:Renuka Chowdhury

Domestic Violence Act
Recommend that SaveIndianFamily start a new Wiki on the Domestic Violence Act and write a proper critique there. Unbalancing the profile of Renuka Chodhary is a cheap shot. Again, the "Famous Quotes" are not relevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.254.104.78 (talk • contribs) 13:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:NPOV & WP:BLP - do no harm
The following has been removed for violating WP:NPOV & WP:BLP: She is a known 'bad case' of extreme feminism.She was also seen defending pratibha patil in the 2007 presidential elections due to her being a woman. Please be aware of the policy for writing biographies of living persons. Central to this policy is the term do no harm - "Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid; it is not our job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives." This includes speculation about their motivations and/or actions. If any claims like the above are to be added to any BLP - they must be sourced and they must be worded in a conservative and neutral fashion. Failure to comply with this policy is a serious issue on wikipedia and can result in warnings and blocks (template warnings such as blp2 are far from trivial)-- Cailil  talk 15:07, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Removed ICDS section as utterly unsourced. What is believed about a person cannot be added to wikipedia.  Only what is sourced and uncontravertial - see WP:BLP-- Cailil   talk 13:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Too much sockpuppetry
I see that someone has been using a lot of socks in order to insert personal opinion into the article. I've blocked some of them and semi protected the article fro a month's rest. Theresa Knott | The otter sank 14:47, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Encroached?
Do wiki authors know the meaning of encroachment?

How come they claim she encroached government bunglow?

Wiki is for useless - jobless i*iots - that has been proved now! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.96.14.157 (talk) 07:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Pathetic POV
The article has only criticisms. It selectively quotes her, out of context, etc. Vilification is clearly the aim. I am putting a POV tag. --Sahodaran (talk) 01:15, 19 December 2010 (UTC)

Parking text
This text may not be suitable for the article unless sources can be found that verify the outcome of the case per WP:BLP
 * In 2005, Chowdhary was charged in a 12-year-old case concerning a policeman and a traffic related incident.(Feb 10, 2005) Court orders framing of charges against Renuka Times of India, retrieved March 30 2012-- — Keithbob • Talk  • 21:08, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Spelling of name
None of the six sources cited in the article spell the subjects name as list in the title:Chowdary. Instead, two sources list is as: Chowdhury, two others as: Choudhury, one as: Chaudhary, and one as: Choudhry. We may need to rename this aricle.-- — Keithbob • Talk  • 21:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Biased, POV and inclined to criticism
Article is full of criticism. And criticism mentioned seems nothing but daily news materials which might have sparked havoc for a short period of time. Someone hate this person must have added. I searched if any of info mentioned has significant impact on person political career. I am removing entire section. -- 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ☣ 06:46, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:00, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Smt. Renuka Choudhury in her office after assuming the charge as Minister of State (Independent Charge) for Tourism in New Delhi on May 24, 2004.jpg