Talk:Report on Manufactures

Untitled
Added additional detail to original article including wikifying content and link to original full report for notation and reference. --Northmeister 18:49, 1 May 2007 (UTC)


 * There's a bunch of unsourced assertions in the article. Removing them is not "vandalism". ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 01:49, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Your history is a history of biased deletions and vandalism and trolling. --Northmeister 03:18, 17 August 2007 (UTC) -Further the inter-wiki link to American School has numerous citations indicating where you placed source needed. You know this clearly and your simply deleting material and adding citation needed to harass this editor as others who have dealt with your conspiracy type well know. --Northmeister 03:23, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

I changed this sentence "...protect American infant industry for a short term until it could compete" as it gave the impression of child labor as the main industry focused on by the report. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.118.175.10 (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

No mention of washighton?
Why is not mention made of George wAshington's specific request for a report on manufatures, nor why? From Alexander Hamilton by Ron Chernow: ""The imputes for the report had been laregely military and strategic in nature. Washington had admonished congress that a "free people" ought to "promote such manufatcories as render them independant (of) others for essentials, particulalrly for military supplies." (P374) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.217.251 (talk) 19:32, 7 September 2012 (UTC)