Talk:Republic, The Campaign for an Elected Head of State

Why has this been deleted?

Non-notable. What does this society do? Does it have events, members? What is it?--Couter-revolutionary 22:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

How childish of youRepublicUK 20:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's not being childish. I am wondering if it does anything? Does it? You ought know...--Couter-revolutionary 20:15, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

It is a campaign for an elected head of state.RepublicUK 20:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes and I'm head of the "Campaign to Make Counter-Revolutionary Wikipedia Head of State", is my organisation notable. Clearly not.  What makes this one notable. --Couter-revolutionary 20:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

It has been mentioned in the media several times, It has been mentioned in the British parliament several times and has many notable supporters.RepublicUK 20:28, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
 * At the end of the day it is, of course, up to the given Admin. to take the decision, I have, however, seen articles fulfill those requirements be deleted.--Couter-revolutionary 20:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Serious article
This is a topic of very significant consequence. People are advocating the replacement of the British monarchy with a republic, talk that would have gotten them spedily into prison in the nineteenth century and much of the twentieth century. The issue of republic versus monarchy is one that stocked the conservative ancien regime reaction against liberalism in Britain and on the European continent throughout the nineteenth century. It is rather remarkable that editors are hurling charges such as sock puppet. This organization is a bona fide organization with dozens of supporters among political and cultural figures in British society. The BBC and the Guardian newspaper had given reference to it in a series of articles in 2003. The latter newspaper was able to evade a treason conviction for publishing articles about the topic. Dogru144 18:27, 4 March 2007 (UTC)