Talk:Republic Cafe and Ming Lounge

Building's historic status
I was wondering if you had a moment to check my summary of the building's historic status, based on this source (site #16)? Without being too detailed because I'm not exactly sure how to separate the business from the building, I'm hoping my text at least explains how the restaurant has some architectural significance. Does you have any suggestions or proposed changes? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I rewrote the first sentence in the "Building" section to more fully spell out what the building's "non-contributing" status means, since "non-contributing" is NRHP jargon. The definition is included in the NRHP document you referenced, so I don't think any additional citation is needed. Feel free to clean up further.
 * Please pardon my long delay in replying. I've been on an extended wikibreak and this is my first time looking at my messages in about 6 months. &mdash; Ipoellet (talk) 03:24, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , No problem at all. Please feel free to improve the article's text as you see fit. Welcome back! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

New source
--- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:46, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.wweek.com/food/2023/02/08/the-republic-cafe-is-entering-its-second-century/