Talk:Republica (newspaper)

Move?

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved to República (Nepalese newspaper). Favonian (talk) 09:06, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

MyRepublica → República –
 * The name of the topic (a Nepalese newspaper) is República, not MyRepublica. MyRepublica is simply the name of the website and has no relation to anything. There _is_ a separate La República newspaper in Peru. If the names are felt to be too similar, then the page should be moved to República (Nepalese newspaper) and República turned into a dab; but I think my suggestion plus two hatnotes should be fine. — LlywelynII  05:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I would contest the move because the term "República" is enormously confusable. N oetica Tea? 06:55, 1 May 2012 (UTC) [My note on moving this to "contested moves" –N.]
 * I'd agree with Noetica. Would be happy with República (Nepalese newspaper). bobrayner (talk) 08:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Agree with moving to República (Nepalese newspaper). --DAJF (talk) 13:41, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose, as this is the English language Wikipedia. GoodDay (talk) 19:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose, though of course it was a well-motivated suggestion. I too support República (Nepalese newspaper). That gives the appropriate degree of precision, since both República (Nepal) and República (newspaper) would be misunderstand by almost all readers. N oetica Tea? 00:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also agree that República (Nepalese newspaper) looks like the way to go. República should remain a redirect to Republic as it has been since 2005. Jenks24 (talk) 01:41, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.