Talk:Republican Party of Virginia

Untitled
It is obvious this was written by a non-Republican person(s). Should not show your true colors in what is suppose to be an unbiased description and/or explanation of actions by other persons. I object to word use in what appears to be statements, but are in fact ones own beliefs, author. Thus, I strongly agree with the 1st comment below on Policy positions. Furthermore, I agree w Quackslikeaduck input on the need to state 'policy' only, as apposed to listing individuals. [User:MiMi] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.211.165 (talk) 17:56, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

I've done the best job I could to summarize and update the current events section, a section which I did not start. StevenL, who added the NPOV tag, did not state his objections. I see that he is a Ron Paul supporter and perhaps feels that the Virginia Republican party is not giving Ron Paul sufficient attention. For a more complete picture, I added a sentence and reference to the party leaders' proposal to moderate the abusive driver fees. Racepacket 13:35, 4 September 2007 (UTC)


 * This was so long ago, I forgot what my objections were. I actually don't have any major objections to what goes on at 115 E Grace Street, although I do support Ron Paul.  --StevenL (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

I made edits mainly grammatical such as referring to stuff in January 2009 as being in the future... which is kinda hard considering we are in march 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salestron (talk • contribs) 04:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Policy positions
The "Policy positions" section includes positions of the Virginia Republican Party as well as bills supported by members of the elected legislature. Because this article is about the Virginia Republican Party itself, rather than politicians who caucus with other Republicans, I feel that this section should only include official policy positions of the Virginia Republican Party. Thoughts? ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 14:50, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The "policy positions" section doesn't have anything to do with RPV at all, but are biased complaints about individuals. It should be removed. 74.79.142.29 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:30, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090312071322/http://www.rpv.org:80/candidates/ to http://www.rpv.org/candidates/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:19, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20081029031831/http://www.williamjhowell.org/files/20080312%20-%20Speaker%20News%20Release%20-%20Howell%20Statement%20on%20Budget%20Agreement.doc to http://www.williamjhowell.org/files/20080312%20-%20Speaker%20News%20Release%20-%20Howell%20Statement%20on%20Budget%20Agreement.doc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 one external links on Republican Party of Virginia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513091645/http://www.governor.virginia.gov/News/viewRelease.cfm?id=163 to http://www.governor.virginia.gov/news/viewRelease.cfm?id=163
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120226103349/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2008/07261AFC-9ED3-410F-B07D-84D014AB2C6B/Official/1_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2008/07261AFC-9ED3-410F-B07D-84D014AB2C6B/Official/1_s.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131005215807/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2008/07261AFC-9ED3-410F-B07D-84D014AB2C6B/Official/6_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2008/07261AFC-9ED3-410F-B07D-84D014AB2C6B/Official/6_s.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721074243/https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2010/EB24720D-F5C6-4880-8DC5-12AE4D0C3772/official/6_s.shtml to https://www.voterinfo.sbe.virginia.gov/election/DATA/2010/EB24720D-F5C6-4880-8DC5-12AE4D0C3772/official/6_s.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Keep the Confederate statutes, says John Whitbeck
On Aug 14, 2017; John Whitbeck told CNN Wolf Blitzer that in the aftermath of the Charlotte incident that the confederate statutes should not come down. Needs to be readily apparent in the article as the platform of the Virginia Republicans. --Wikipietime (talk) 18:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)