Talk:Reputation/Archives/2013

Needs rewrite
Very poor article (=foggy and sloppy). Probably it would be the best to delete it (giving the opportunity for someone to rewrite it) or completly rewrite it by authors, focusing on clear summary of ideas and the target audience (wide public). -- 12 Mar 2010, SpeoLori —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.24.57.69 (talk) 18:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Vfd
On 28 Mar 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Votes for deletion/Reputation for a record of the discussion. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:28, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Deleted unimportant quote
I have deleted the following quote which was at the beginning of the article because I think it is not important enough to be in such place. Cassio. Reputation, reputation, reputation! O! I have lost my reputation. I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial. My reputation, Iago, my reputation! Iago. As I am an honest man, I thought you had received some bodily wound; there is more offence in that than in reputation. Reputation is an idle and most false imposition; oft got without merit, and lost without deserving: you have lost no reputation at all, unless you repute yourself such a loser. What! man; there are ways to recover the general again; you are but now cast in his mood, a punishment more in policy than in malice; even so as one would beat his offenceless dog to affright an imperious lion. Sue to him again, and he is yours. Shakespeare, Othello, the Moor of Venice Act II. Scene III, 225-226. Our italics.

Bad Experience in Alertpay and Dailyinv.com
I\'d trnsferred my deposit to dailyinv.com on September08/2011 via alertpay.com : but the money went into one personal named Marian Pobozny (her/his email, marian76@windowslive.com).

who she/he is? Is she/he the beneficiary for dailyinv.com account in Alertpay ? or someone else ???
 * I\'m in the cloud


 * I\'d contacted Alertpay and Dailyinv.com for verification and explanation. Until now, there\'s no clear & specific answer given.


 * I\'d called for retraction of fund : this was also fell into the deft ear.!!

Please resolve this matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.82.94.84 (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Texas Digital LED display introduces digital signage product line
Recently, the Texas Digital Systems company has introduced its digital signage LED outdoor display screen production line. LED outdoor display screen can be used to separate the information transmitted, or a large number of static symbols incorporated. LED outdoor display applications include not only University campus, stadiums, parks, entertainment, Office, Exhibition Center, there are commercial areas of advertising and promotion. Increase brightness and contrast both in energy-saving LED display is full color and monochrome, user can choose according to area of application and budget. Messages can be transformed in thebrightest flashlight process of transmission, and Texas Digital VitalCAST software updates as a symbol. For those with restricted installation and video information into the frequency area, Texas Digital also provides a simple click software. The assembled LED outdoor display systems take into account the maximum flexibility, almost tailored to various specifications. Monitor up to 45 feet high and 80 feet wide, pixel spacing size dimensions such as 13.3mm, 16mm, and 20mm, to meet the needs of different viewing distances. At the University of Texas City Texas Digital customer services Vice President Romney described Stewart, durability, lower maintenance costs and maintenance service is the monitor on the component in the design and selection of primary consideration. He said, "Texas Digital is known as efficient and effective product solutions, our LED products for outdoor display, the same professional level. Our professional project management team to ensure a perfect process of installing one-stop service. ”　　 Texas Digital outdoor Visual communication solutions has more than 15 years of experience in development, AccuVIEW drove customers window displays to confirm orders in excess of 24,000, and OmniVIEW outdoor LCD monitors are installed all over the world. 　　 Texas Digital LED outdoor module with front-end availability, military flashlight which means that they are more easy to access, and module properties of the product makes all symbols can properly service or maintenance work in the field. About a foot apart each independent LED modules are interchangeable, made after the repair install. 　　 Texas Digital chief operating officer Dennis Davidson says: "our customers have been reflecting on the urgent need for such signs, so we can look forward to at this point to provide a complete solution, with a vendor-supplied and supported by combining indoor and outdoor signage in a system. ”

power by : www.supfireflashlight.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.5.150.146 (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Coin a new lexical item
According to WP:OR policy, proposition of a new lexical item cannot be set forth in an article. I refer to the wording:"'At this point we can propose to coin a new lexical item, image, whose character should be immediately evident from the following: ...'" I recommend the finding of another (parallel) published author/source using the term image as essentially defined in the article by the contributor (in equivalent terms) and cite the supportive source-text in footnote. The wording in the article could be emended thus:"'At this point we can propose with [ here name the author/source and  ] to use a relatively new lexical item, the synonym 'image,' whose character should be immediately evident from the following: ...'" --Humaniphilon (talk) 05:41, 21 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Apart from this neologism problem, the sentence quoted above also has an inappropriate essay-like tone, using the first-person we inappropriately. In fact, the whole section A cognitive view of reputation has serious issues. The section appears to be based on Chapter 3 of [], which appears to be a primary source as far as this section's subject is concerned. --Lambiam 14:34, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Seems to me a Wikified re-write of the article, particularly of the problematical section, could be achieved without use of the contributor's proposed synonym by simply focussing on the subject itself.  A single reference to Social Beliefs for Social Order as you cited above might possibly be relevant in footnote such as  see...for a discussion; before putting it in, however, its inclusion should first be discussed here, but I don't really see that as happening. All text representing the contributor's apparent use of the article as a platform of opportunity to propose his/her own original research to illustrate a personal perception of a recent development in business terminology or public relations communication could be excised.  Cf. the Oxford English Dictionary entries "image" (cf. "façade") and "reputation" (cf. "name").  The topic itself merits treatment.  The article could be saved with a re-write in neutral tone and without the neologism.  I'll look at it again in 3 or 4 months to see what, if anything, might be done, and see what the community says or has done with the article.  --Humaniphilon (talk) 07:31, 2 June 2012 (UTC)