Talk:Reputation management/Archives/2021

advertising tag
Much of this article is written in language that seems to be trying to persuade rather than simply inform. valereee (talk) 12:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

It clearly seems yes. Sounds like a corporate management class like the ones I had as a younger (Thank god I was able to leave it early rightafter).

--OjuzKiopo (talk) 10:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Article centered almost only at companies
A few public organisation also had been having such practises:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre-sur-Haute_military_radio_station

French governement requested this article to be removed to french wikipedia, one of the admnistrators was taken into custody by French police. At the end governement could not force wikipedia to remove it after a litigation.

FBI has had done the same thing.. http://edition.cnn.com/2010/TECH/web/08/03/fbi.seal.wikipedia/index.html?hpt=T2 https://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/03/us/03fbi.html?_r=1&partner=rss&emc=rss

Against the lawsuit was lost. And wikipedia proudly stands with the FBI seal on the FBI page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OjuzKiopo (talk • contribs) 09:19, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Here's a source, in case somebody has the time to make use of it in the article
A quite unethical example:

https://www.qurium.org/forensics/dark-ops-undercovered-episode-i-eliminalia/

https://www.qurium.org/forensics/dark-ops-undercovered-episode-ii-eliminalia-analysis-of-fake-dmca-complaints/   Notrium (talk) 23:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)