Talk:Rescued by Rover/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:


 * B. MoS compliance:


 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for the review. I've addressed most of the issues you've raised except for the references - I'll have to hit the library for that so I can get the correct books listed. Also thanks for the offer of going through the text to smooth it out, I appreciate it. Miyagawa   (talk)  20:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Managed to swap out the two web references that had sources with alternative book sources. Miyagawa   (talk)  14:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great Job! I've done a quick copy-edit and it seems fine to me. I'd try to find some better sources for some of the web ones, but this is for GA not FA. Overall this is great work on an interesting part of film history. I've passed it! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Thanks for the review. I've addressed most of the issues you've raised except for the references - I'll have to hit the library for that so I can get the correct books listed. Also thanks for the offer of going through the text to smooth it out, I appreciate it. Miyagawa   (talk)  20:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Managed to swap out the two web references that had sources with alternative book sources. Miyagawa   (talk)  14:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great Job! I've done a quick copy-edit and it seems fine to me. I'd try to find some better sources for some of the web ones, but this is for GA not FA. Overall this is great work on an interesting part of film history. I've passed it! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review. I've addressed most of the issues you've raised except for the references - I'll have to hit the library for that so I can get the correct books listed. Also thanks for the offer of going through the text to smooth it out, I appreciate it. Miyagawa   (talk)  20:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Managed to swap out the two web references that had sources with alternative book sources. Miyagawa   (talk)  14:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Great Job! I've done a quick copy-edit and it seems fine to me. I'd try to find some better sources for some of the web ones, but this is for GA not FA. Overall this is great work on an interesting part of film history. I've passed it! Andrzejbanas (talk) 14:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)