Talk:Research-Technology Management

bullpucky
THis journal is pure tech boosterism blather which oblivious of economic and business realities. It is purely worthless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.59.147.72 (talk) 20:48, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Award winning?
It gives out an award. The article sounds like PR, I'll make a few edits. --WiseWoman (talk) 21:37, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Here is the "Awards" section, which I don't find relevant for journals, as awards are meaningless for academic journals:

==Awards== In 2002, 2003, and 2004 RTM received the “Golden Page Award” from Emerald Management Reviews for “Practical Usability of Research” in the category of "Operations and Product Management." In 2004, an RPI citation-based study conducted by Jonathan D. Linton and Narongsak (Tek) Thongpapanl ranked RTM third among technology innovation management specialty journals. In 2009, an article authored by Kurt Swogger and Greg Stevens titled "Creating a Winning R&D Culture-I," which appeared in the January–February 2009 issue of RTM, was given a Citation of Excellence Award by Emerald Management Reviews. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WiseWoman (talk • contribs) 21:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)