Talk:Resident Evil 3: Nemesis/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ProtoDrake (talk · contribs) 20:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Alright, I'm jumping into here, as this article comes recommended as a reasonably easy pass, though I have yet to see it for myself. I'll be back for a review in a day or two. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:29, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Review
Generally good, but spotted a few things:
 * This is optional, but removing the brackets formatting from around the cover art so it automatically fits within the infobox might be advisable.
 * Removed --Niwi3 (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "Unlike previous Resident Evil games, Resident Evil 3: Nemesis was designed to have a more action-oriented gameplay." - the "a" is redundant within that sentence. It should be removed.
 * Removed --Niwi3 (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "...created by Umbrella for the sole purpose of eliminating surviving STARS members, who are first-hand witnesses of Umbrella's unethical and illegal experiments." - This is purely optional, but I would think the word "illegal" would also cover "unethical". As I said, optional. You can leave it as is if you prefer.
 * I agree. The simpler, the better. --Niwi3 (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * "When Carlos leaves the hospital, a large amount of explosives explode in the hospital's main lobby." - in what way is this relevant? Also, if it is relevant, two "eplo" words so close together looks a little odd. Maybe "detonate" rather than "explode".
 * I agree. I never understood what the point of the explosives scene was. --Niwi3 (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

That's all I really saw. Once these issues are address/explained/decided upon, I would be happy to pass this article. --ProtoDrake (talk) 20:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your helpful review, really appreciated. I think I have addressed all the issues you had with the article. Please let me know if there is anything else that needs to be fixed. --Niwi3 (talk) 22:20, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, that was everything. Glad to be of help. --ProtoDrake (talk) 22:24, 2 April 2015 (UTC)