Talk:Responsibility assignment matrix

Merge proposal
The article on Responsibility assignment matrix cover the same ground as RACI matrix; so I would like to propose redirecting Responsibility assignment matrix to the appropriate section in this article. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 03:30, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

The article on RASIC is even more similar to RACI matrix; so I have also proposed merging RASIC with this article. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 01:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Not sure if the merge has already happened, but sounds good to me. Showeropera (talk) 15:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

"Submitter" or "Requestor"
I'm looking for a process assignment categorization system that includes a role of "submitter" or "requestor" or somesuch. I would prefer something that's compatible with a diagramming system like EPC or BPM. The point of the goal is to have a complete end-to-end chain of responsibility and action, however none of the RACI variants seem to fit (except inasmuch as "Informed" would fit the submitter, but it's not very explicit) and I can't find any other similar system that fits. I'm reticent to create an internally-used variant of my own, preferring to adhere to some sort of published standard. Does anyone here have any suggestions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdray (talk • contribs) 20:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

RAIDE
I have also seen RAIDE (Book definition to be found, possibly part of Kaplan's work) In the definition I have seen RAIDE stands for


 * Recommender
 * Approver
 * Informed (Consulted)
 * Decider
 * Executer

With the obvious definitions for each word --193.35.250.234 (talk) 10:35, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

No history paragraph
I'm searching where and when this tool has been invented. So, I'm not ready to create a history paragraph now. JackPotte (talk) 20:50, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) The oldest Google book to mention it was in 1999.
 * 2) ITIL has integrated it as if it was a part of it (and ITIL talks about it).
 * 3) The Motorola Sig Sigma method did that too, and our images are categorized like that (but that's not into Six Sigma).

Mistake in the picture
In the picture "Assigning people to facilities, there is a row "C04 Security Governance (draft)".  I think there is a problem in that this row does not have an "R" in it. This means that no one is actually tasked with actually doing this item.  This is a mistake in the content of the picture.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.89.84.88 (talk) 15:06, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree, it does seem that "R" would be mandatory. It occurs to me that the image could be replaced by a wikitable – given that it's just a text grid – and corrected in the process. Unfortunately this isn't a good time for me to do this myself, but I'll leave this thought here for future reference ... – Wdchk (talk) 18:04, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Pageviews, Importance-assessed as High
This article gets an average of 2,162 pageviews a day, which is astounding. I have accordingly reassessed its Importance as High. Please improve the article, for the next million readers. Abductive (reasoning) 04:34, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks Abductive! My company is using the RAIL (Recommends, Approves, Informed, Leads) model and I don't know where it comes from. I don't mean that it should be in the article. If the article were more advanced and RAIL was not considered for some reason, that could be a reason for my company to turn to a more recognized system.
 * I could have started a new section but my main point is to confirm the relevance of working on the article. :)
 * If I get some Wikipedia relevant information on RAIL I will add it. Feel free to correct me if needed then. Gfombell (talk) 13:42, 3 April 2023 (UTC)