Talk:Resttschechei

Gloss: failed verification
An anonymous IP has glossed Resttschechei as "remnants of Czechia"; however, this gloss does not appear in either of the sources currently cited. The URL citation "http://www.jpress.nli.org.il/..." (a search engine result, not a source per se) contains only the term Czechia in isolation but does not gloss Resttschechei and therefore fails verification. The cited RFE/RL source contains the gloss "remnants of the Czech lands". Doremo (talk) 13:16, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Rest = remnants, Tschechei = Czechia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.168.13.98 (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

To removing of Buidhe's redirect
I'm sorry for my little confused edit summary – erroneously I pressed "enter" before completing my reason. ;) So, here it is: Buidhe's previous redirect (in fact, deleting of sourced article) was done without any discussion, just on the basis of his arbitrary conclusion that this term/theme "isn't independently notable". I don't agree. --Iaroslavvs (talk) 17:54, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm also puzzled by this decision. A Google scholar search suggests that this subject is covered in a fair number of German-language publications. While it is strictly a subtopic of the rest of the German occupation, it's a term that covers a broad enough chunk of history that it could probably stand to have an article written about it in detail that would not be appropriate to include in a higher level article about Nazi Germany. signed,Rosguill talk 01:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)