Talk:Resurrection of the Daleks

"Erroneous" companion omissions
Did the production team actually say that Kamelion and the second K-9 were accidental omissions? Leela was, but Kamelion had barely been in more than one story and they may well have decided that showing two slightly different K-9s would be silly. Are we using erroneous in the sense that they meant to include a companion and forgot (as with Leela), or in the more POV sense that we think those should have been there but they weren't? --Whouk (talk) 23:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Episode breaks
I have added the 'long' episode break. Is there any way to use a dotted line to show where 'short' episodes 1 & 3 ended? --Jawr256 09:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure that's possible. I added a note to show where the four-part breaks were designed to go, but not sure if that's entirely successful. --khaosworks (talk • contribs) 09:46, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * We could try something like this:
 * 
 * &mdash;Wh o  uk (talk) 15:33, 13 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Good idea --Jawr256 07:01, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Just to complicate things even further an early edit of the four part version was sold overseas, minus music & sound effects on some episodes but also with an additional scene in the short part two and the cliffhanger not at the point where Stein reveals he's a Dalek agent but a few seconds later as the Daleks surround the Doctor. But I think the BBC Video & DVD releases use what is the "final" version before the compliation was made. Timrollpickering 09:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Special Guests
As this was before leslie grantham became famous, does he really count as a special guest? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.68.111.211 (talk) 23:13, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Body Count
Firstly I can't find any media reports on the body count being notably high. Secondly The Terminator has an on-screen body count of 28. Thus unless someone can rustle up some media or other noteworthy analysis of what constitutes a high body count (40-odd humans lasered or shot with magic bullets that produce no blood is more note-worthy than some other count somewhere else...?) then I propose this section regarding The Terminator be deleted, and we leave the reference in the production notes section that gives the accurate body count. Finally I find this body count thing quite irrelevent, I don't see Star Wars being critisied for entire planets being blown up on screen, yet 20-odd Daleks is notable? ;-) --Ant (talk) 15:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Resurrection of the Daleks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130110084344/http://www.dwfiles.com/ to http://www.dwfiles.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:17, 31 December 2017 (UTC)