Talk:Return of Kings

Notability
I've tagged this article as being potentially non-notable, because most of the sources are obscure or unreliable. The use of graduate and undergraduate essays and theses is a red flag. Substantial sources are mainly about Roosh V or pickup artist culture in general, not this site specifically. The number of monthly visitors, even during the spike, is very low for a notable blog, but regardless, sources need to explain how the site is notable, not just what it posts. Naming graduate students who mention the site in their theses doesn't resolve this, and may be seen as a subtle appeal to authority. Grayfell (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
 * The page is also essentially a WP:CONTENTFORK of the section at . I don't see a clear reason to put this material on a separate page. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 02:16, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Page is now a redirect. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2017 (UTC)