Talk:Reunion (advertisement)

Notability??
Do we really need a separate article on every video that goes "viral"?--Soulparadox (talk) 09:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


 * This stub (Stub) meets notability guidelines WP:NOTE as outlined below:

"Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a passing mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.[1] "Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media, and in any language. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability. "Sources"[2] should be secondary sources, as those provide the most objective evidence of notability. There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected.[3] Sources do not have to be available online and do not have to be in English. Multiple publications from the same author or organization are usually regarded as a single source for the purposes of establishing notability. "Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by the article's subject or someone affiliated with it. For example, advertising, press releases, autobiographies, and the subject's website are not considered independent.[4] "Presumed" means that significant coverage in reliable sources creates an assumption, not a guarantee, that a subject should be included. A more in-depth discussion might conclude that the topic actually should not have stand-alone article—perhaps because it violates what Wikipedia is not, particularly the rule that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information.[5]


 * The topic itself - the Partition of India -- is notable. If the issue lies in the fact that it is a Google advertisement, there is a paradigm within Wikipedia for this such as:


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_(advertisement)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_Different


 * It is a stub which means that it will grow over time, it has had significant coverage since it has come out, it has had an impact on two nations India and Pakistan. Notability is thus established. -Classicfilms (talk) 12:29, 16 November 2013 (UTC)


 * I've expanded a bit re: MOS:FILM. -Classicfilms (talk) 14:20, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I've upgraded the article to "Start" class. -Classicfilms (talk) 06:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Official credit list?
It would be helpful to have a full official credit list so if anyone finds one, please post. I found an unofficial one on facebook, something that we cannot use in a Wikipedia article but I will put it here -
 * https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?id=420870314596798&story_fbid=754581827892310

-Classicfilms (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

grammar
Don't understand the double appearance of was in the following sentence: "the only thing they wanted was to see was how meaningful the search engine is in real life" Uziel302 (talk) 16:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I didn't add this quote - but it looks like it is a typo in the original source. I made an adjustment in the article that should solve the problem. -Classicfilms (talk) 06:38, 29 November 2013 (UTC)