Talk:Rev7 Gum

cOMMENTS
The lead is a little hard to understand. Try simplifying the language. Keep researching the subject and this article can only get better.--Jtbunting1 (talk) 22:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

1. This article is clearly written although extremely short and lacking detail. 2. For the amount of information given the article seems factually accurate. 3. Article covers the topic narrowly at best. 4. This article is written from a neutral point of view 5. This article is stable. 6. There are no image policy wrongdoings in this article. 7. Article is free of obvious copyright violations JedGooden (talk) 23:13, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I've modified this article to reflect the product - all images have fair-use rationale. Ian ¹³  /t  14:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)