Talk:Reverse convertible securities

[Untitled]
Should this not be called "reverse convertible securities" rather than "reverse convertible securities"? There are problems in linking the page if the title is wrong - otherwise well done!

Well it is not very clear. We should be inspired by what investment banks produce in terms of marketing.. they even give the decomposition of the structure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.45.249.143 (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

This looks and feels like a sophisticated sales pitch. Also, I followed some of the references at the bottom of the page; perhaps I didn't look hard enough, but I couldn't find any mention of "reverse convertible securities" on those sites. All I found was a bunch of stuff on "structured products," what ever that is. This looks like it can go. Yewlongbow (talk) 10:47, 27 October 2009 (UTC)