Talk:Reverse marketing/Archives/2012

Merger proposal
I propose that Attraction Marketing be merged into Reverse marketing. I think that the content in the Attraction Marketing article can easily be explained in the context of Reverse marketing, and the Reverse marketing article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Attraction Marketing will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. While Attraction Marketing is a longer article, much of its content is stylistically weird from an encyclopedic point of view. It reads more like an attempt to convince the reader of the value of its subject than an encylopedic entry. It also states outright that it is the same concept as Reverse marketing, it is another name for the same concept. Andrewaskew (talk) 04:27, 2 May 2012 (UTC)