Talk:Review of systems

Relation to history
The recently added (Oct 2019) content in the Relation to History section is sub-standard. Can someone with more experience than me either edit it into better shape or revert those changes?

This needs a major overhaul!
I will see what I can do with bringing this up to standard--it lacks references and those that are there (CMS 2011) are hopelessly out-of-date. Welcome any input, esp. editorial review, corrections, discussion, etc.

CMS Changed the regulation in 2021-2022. This doesn't change what the ROS needs to do, but they did away with (for outpatient visits, at least) the byzantine accounting system in CPT5 where you needed so many of this column, and how many from the next, etc. etc. until you bled from the eyes...

Each symptom is going to need a link to a DDx, as well as making sure there is a proper SNOMED-CT code for it so people can actually use this information. Similarly, there needs to be the correct LOINC and SNOMED-CT codes for the sections. (Not every Anglophone country uses LOINC, e.g. I believe that the U.K. doesn't).

Kevin DrKC MD (talk) 17:14, 7 June 2023 (UTC)