Talk:Revival of Kalarippayattu

Merge proposal
The revival topic is simply not big enough to justify it having a seperate article, the info is good but if should be included in the main article. --Nate1481(t/c) 08:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Bad idea, since for a person new to this martial art, the article Revival of Kalarippayattu would not be of sepcific concern, and shall remain as an extra feature; hence it should be kept separate from the encyclopedic article about the martial art, Kalarippayattu, though it can be developed further. Merger to the main article:NO! (Ekabhishek (talk) 05:16, 17 September 2008 (UTC))
 * I think that 'revival' does not deserve to be a new article, it should mention as a seperate section in the main article. -- Avinesh  T  08:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

The main article already has all the info from the revival article. They've pretty much been merged already, just delete the latter. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.50.18.181 (talk) 08:51, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I had forgotten this, going to merge/redirect later this week unless there are objections. --Nate1481 12:17, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

After going through the section i feel that both can be merged after some minor editing..Raamah (talk) 16:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)