Talk:RevoPower/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

This article has been listed as a good article in October 2007, and has since been overseen by the cycling project. While I personally don't think it is notable, there have been some newsitems about it that are included in the article. But the quality of the article is not Good; It is rated as C-class, which I think is a better assessment of the quality.

Some examples:


 * "Steve Katsaros, the creator of the Wheel". I am sure that this Steve did not invent the wheel. Maybe the RevoPower, but this should be phrased differently.


 * "... have led to speculation that the product is a scam". Maybe, but I am sure that this needs to be sourced to be included in Wikipedia.


 * "Some speculated there were technical problems with the design". Here too, a source is needed.


 * Because the company website is no longer online, four of the nine references do not work anymore.

The creator of the article has left Wikipedia, so I can not notify him/her. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2009 (UTC)


 * (Original Creator:) Thank you. Due to time (the original site, as you mention) and poor contributions since I left the project, it is not the article it once was. I fully agree that the article needs work, and hopefully your reclassification will spur someone on to do it. -- lucid 20:32, 5 November 2009 (UTC)