Talk:Revolution Software/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) 21:39, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: One found and fixed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:44, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead does not adequately summarise the article, see WP:LEAD
 * There is an undue use of promotional and POV language.
 * The is a mixture of inline hyperlinks and citations.
 * The prose is not very good, not "reasonably well written".
 * Not well organised, information needs to be presented logically. Please read WP:MoS and subpages.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * What makes GameFAQs and Revfans reliable sources?
 * Most of the sources are WP:Primary sources. This needs good third party sources.
 * Wikipedia can not be used as a source.
 * There is no sourcing for game releases in the Games section.
 * Sources used for citations are also present in the external links section which is not permitted, see WP:EL
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * No mention of sales figures; no real indication of whether this company meets the WP:CORP guidelines.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Appears overly promotional
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * The specific source of the image needs to be provided.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Shoddily put together, please read the good article criteria and make sure that this article meetrs them before renominating. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2011 (UTC)