Talk:Revolutionary Socialist Party (Netherlands)

This article needs to be split. MLL Front already has a separate article. Separate articles needed for RSV, OSP, RSAP. --Soman 14:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * My policy is that only parties with parliamentary representation are notable for en.wikipedia pages. Neither the RSV, OSP and RSAP ever attained parliamentary representation, this is just historical background. Note that the Marx-Lenin-Luxemburg Front is a separate page. If you are bent on splitting "different" parties in different articles, also check what I've done to the Communist Party of the Netherlands (in which I incorporate SDP, CPH and CPN in one story). I don't see the point of splitting it in other articles, which will be unread stubs. C mon 19:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * No, there is a difference here. SDP-CPH-CPN are the same party, but under different names. OSP and RSP were two separate parties, existing parallel to each other. --Soman 20:00, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * But your main issue is with the MLL, which is a continuation of the MLL. But how do you feel about the policy, for me it sounds quite logical. C mon 20:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * ? My main issue is that RSP and OSP have to be in separate articles. Possibly RSV could be in the same as RSP, and possibly (if OSP is deemed to have been of significantly lesser importance) RSAP could be in the same as RSP. --Soman 20:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry I appear to have misread your original posting. It thought it read "MLL Front really needs a separate article". Anyway, for the RSV this is just some historical background, which should be kept here (independent of whether you want to create an RSV-article, to which I am opposed). So the question is about the OSP do you honestly want to create stubby articles for minor parties which did not have any effect on Dutch politics? I don't. C mon 22:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, even small parties have effect in their own way. The material on OSP currently in this article is well enough for a separate article. --Soman 09:56, 13 February 2007 (UTC)