Talk:Rewrite (video game)/GA3

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: BrianDeeG (talk · contribs) 13:43, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quickfail
Per WP:RGA, section 3.1, I am "quickfailing" this nomination due to concerns about verifiability because I have no way of knowing if the sources are reliable or objective. Therefore, quickfail applies in accordance with step two of the GAN guidelines.

The entire introductory section "Gameplay" is based on a single source described as the Rewrite Perfect Visual Book and this would appear to be a handbook that accompanies the package as both are published by ASCII Media Works. Several citations link to Amazon which cannot be considered a reliable source (similar to IMBD, etc.). Numerous citations are to the Key site and this is the company that developed the visual novel so it cannot be seen as a reliable, objective, third party source. Then there is the language problem. Japanese sources cannot possibly be checked for reliability by English readers. Perhaps this could achive GA status on the Japanese version of WP? Without verifiability, I cannot proceed and am failing the nomination per the quickfail criteria. --Brian (talk) 13:43, 27 May 2012 (UTC)