Talk:Rex Airlines

Fleet list
Someone has obviously put a lot of work into the Fleet table, but this is non-standard when compared to other airline articles. IMO it is of limited importance to know when a particular aircraft was built, or even to know the registrations of all of the aircraft in the fleet. I think the table should be removed. YSSYguy (talk) 05:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)


 * I think that knowing the registration is unessesary and should be replaced by a simplier fleet table. EZ1234 (talk) 03:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Same with me - a listing stating the airline has 'x of type y' plane seems more appropriate. Wongm (talk) 10:36, 10 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Agreed, If it's a notable aircraft owned by REX it would have been added to the article anyway. Bidgee (talk) 10:39, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I've removed the list of the aircraft fleet and changed it to fleet list like the QantasLink article. Bidgee (talk) 09:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge suggestion
Regional Express Holdings only has one notable subsidiary, Rex Airlines. Much like the listed Qantas Group is incorporated into the Qantas article, propose that Regional Express Holdings be merged into Rex Airlines, the former is largely content forking of the latter. Ensettham (talk) 09:38, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed Clifton9 (talk) 23:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Agreed But it needs to be done better than in the Qantas.  It is not always clear what is being referred to, the group or an element of the group.  It needs to be explained properly in the lead what the article is about.  Currently this is not done in the Qantas article lead.  Aoziwe (talk) 06:12, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 11:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)