Talk:Reynaldo Hill

Pointless
Keep deleting it and I will keep putting it up, so save your time.

Compromise
I think the Reynaldology section in worthy but I think it could be implicated in terms of vanity. I think a compromise would be to keep the section valid and remove individual forum members and links and to closer represent the original section written by me when it was first made. Thnom 12:54, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Do not delete the Reynaldology section!

Please read the guidelines
The "Reynaldology" section keeps getting deleted because it violates the vanity guidelines. Please read this page for further information.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vanity_page

Where does it violate the guidelines? The fandom of this player is legitimate and even he knows and accepts it. It is highly popular amongst the fans.

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Reynaldo Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100214061556/http://databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=HILLREY01 to http://www.databasefootball.com/players/playerpage.htm?ilkid=HILLREY01
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110711075853/http://web.gatorzone.com/football/bios.php?year=2004&sub=team&bio=hill_r.html to http://web.gatorzone.com/football/bios.php?year=2004&sub=team&bio=hill_r.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402035222/http://web.gatorzone.com/football/media/2011/media_guide.pdf to http://web.gatorzone.com/football/media/2011/media_guide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:14, 9 June 2017 (UTC)