Talk:Rhaune Laslett

Untitled
Notability is already established and reliable sources are provided already - is there a possibility that some wikipedians are too quick to apply labels without understanding the article involved BorisAndDoris (talk) 20:34, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * sorry but I've got to disagree. There is a single source listed in a very generic bibliography section. Perhaps some citations to significant coverage in 3rd party sources could clear this up.  As it stands, the article does not meet WP:BIO.--RadioFan (talk) 23:02, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

"A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject." - Wikipedia:Notability (people) A brief look at Google:Books shows 25 entries for Rhaune Laslett, a short search of the articles or book mentioned will reveal sources. It is much easier to apply a tag than to do some constructive editing, guidelines are not rules and open to interpretation, if an article can be improved then please make suggestions or do the editing that is required but don't apply tags without discussion first.BorisAndDoris (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2009 (UTC)