Talk:Rhode Island Urban Debate League

Speedy deletion nomination of Rhode Island Urban Debate League
Demonstrating the significance of the organization was a bit enigmatic from the wiki "your first article" page. I had intended to build up more content once i had more access to people who have been with the Rhode Island Urban Debate League for longer than myself. The problem arises in the lack of electronic documentation of RIUDL and the factual contradictions in some print material. As for demonstrating the importance/significance of the article, what is really meets this threshold? Should i talk about the benefits of policy debate and missions statements regarding skill developement? or more tangible nibbly facts of the initiative to encourage policy debate throughout rhode island h.s. curricula? Thank you.


 * For notability generally see WP:N, for more detail on organizations, see WP:CORP and for clubs, WP:CLUB. For references and citing sources, see WP:RS and WP:CITE. – ukexpat (talk) 18:29, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I did some more work to add notability and hopefully negate the SD classification. Dirk Chivers (talk) 19:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm pretty new to all this editing stuff, so why did you put the wikiproject banner on the talk page? Are you going to take off the SD classification? Dirk Chivers (talk) 22:20, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Nevermind, i've figured out why the banner has been moved, but i would appreciated what more i could do to demonstrate the importance of RIUDL. Dirk Chivers (talk) 22:40, 14 September 2009 (UTC)