Talk:Rhythm of Structure

Response to notability and very long tags
(1). I feel that this page was given the warning about not being relevant by mistake. There are over 50 external links, as well as other external links that were not included. In addition, there are two publications, a film that premiered at the Film Festival, and a course that was taught at a very prestigious university. I understand that this page isn't Pablo Picasso, however, I feel one would be hard pressed to find an art exhibition that's similarly covered in press in our modern day. I also feel that this page has similarities to the set up of The Bridges Organization page with its many different showings.

(2). Article Length. I removed some of the table of contents entries as I read about how long ToCs can trigger length warnings. Is the ToC short enough now to warrant a removal of the length warning?

Reriksenus (talk) 02:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree. There is plenty to warrant encyclopedic validity here. Thanks for commenting Reriksenus. --Heathart (talk) 22:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm removing notability tag now since there is ample notable citations.--Heathart (talk) 19:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)