Talk:Riaz-ul-Haq

Riaz-ul-Haq (correct name as per ECP reference Hasan Okarvi (talk) 01:59, 6 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The ECP has a reputation of stating wrong and incomplete candidate names so I would not rely on ECP data in this case. --Saqib (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Brother How you can say ECP is a bad reputed. Your concept about ECP is completely biased. For your kind information, the name on The name on Ballet paper is also Riaz ul Haq and you can see in 7 august notification of ECP is also Riaz ul Haq Hasan Okarvi (talk) 02:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Nowhere I said ECP is bad reputed. I just said they often state incomplete and misspelled names, therefore I would rely on them when it naming convention. Subject's full name is Chaudhry Riaz-ul-Haq as per the NA website. --Saqib (talk) 05:06, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The profile of NA subject Chaudhry Riaz-ul-Haq is old (Dated 6 November 2015) but I give the uptodate, latest and recent name Riaz ul Haq which is used 25 July Elections and 7 august 2018 notification of ECP. I accept sometimes Both ECP and NA may state incomplete and misspelled names. But without giving concrete evidence, if you said that ECP often state wrong info about candidate names then you are again biased and unreasonably obstinate in will or opinion.Hasan Okarvi (talk) 20:34, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * For Pete's sake, stop calling people biased and stubborn if they have got a difference of opinion. You yourself admit that ECP often state incomplete and misspelled names and then you ask me of evidence. Hilarious man! --Saqib (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * For Pete's sake, stop calling bad reputed to National Institutions like ECP without giving concrete evidence. Mr. Saqib, how you can misinterpret that I admit your opinion. I use word may, not often, you know the difference between may and often?. So, you have no right to put allegations on ECP without giving strong evidence. In my point of view, ECP is more reliable than you and your opinion, if you not giving evidence. Yes, I ask you of evidence because you put allegations on ECP. and please avoid to kidding me!. Hasan Okarvi (talk) 21:03, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 9 August 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 01:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Chaudhry Riaz-ul-Haq → Riaz ul Haq – The original and official name according to ECP, National Assembly and CNIC Hasan Okarvi (talk) 22:26, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
 * talk=yes
 * Oppose The ECP has a reputation of stating wrong and incomplete candidate names (User:Hasan Okarvi admitted the same) so I would not rely on ECP data in this case. Subject's full name is Chaudhry Riaz-ul-Haq as per his profile page on the parliaments website and his official FB page. --Saqib (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Oppose and close as per Saqib. Störm   (talk)  08:58, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Dear Storm, you dont know how is Riaz ul Haq. Have you been asked by Saqib to drop this support !vote here? You have no knowledge about this matter, so for your kind information, this link may helpful per his profile page on Pakistani parliament's website and in current MNAs list (NA-142) . So move this page to Riaz ul Haq. Hasan Okarvi (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * Support Yes the actual name is Riaz ul Haq. so convert it as per Hasan Okarvi .Asghar Lurka (talk) 14:37, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Why do you think his actual name is Riaz ul Haq? And why would a newbie right after creating an account prefer to comment in article renaming stuff? Have you been asked by someone to drop this support !vote here? --Saqib (talk) 14:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Mr. Saqib stop blaming me for asking someone to support. You completely failed for giving evidence, you give Facebook name reference which is totally unreliable (as per wikipedia name policy). Sir I give you another uptodate reference (dated august 13 2018) in which Subject's full name is Riaz ul Haq as  per the NA website profile . So please think/react positively and rationally in this case and bravely accept the reality.Hasan Okarvi (talk) 00:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * I have no interest in interacting with you, since you refuse to act in a civil manner. --Saqib (talk) 07:04, 15 August 2018 (UTC)

Hasan Okarvi and Asghar Lurka are blocked for socking. Sockpuppet investigations/Hasan Okarvi. --Saqib (talk) 19:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.