Talk:Rice Park

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://twincitieswiki.org/Rice_Park, http://www.hmdb.org/marker.asp?marker=42269, http://outhistory.org/oldwiki/Rice_Park, and https://twitter.com/MgnMoeller to name a few. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MarkTraceur (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Also, I'd like to note that this article is clearly written in an overly promotional tone, possibly because at least some of the content is taken from the Twitter account of a promoter for the park. I don't know what kind of fire to kill this with, but hopefully this is a good start. --MarkTraceur (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2015 (UTC)